This post is the summary of GTG 75 Cervical Cerclage which was published in February 2022. This guideline supplements NICE 25 Preterm labour, GTG 73 PPROM and GTG 74 Antenatal corticosteroids. To prepare the topic comprehensively, it is advisable to read the other guidelines as well.
I hope this summary is helpful.
Your feedback and suggestions to improve future posts are welcome.
Thanks
To download the guidelines
- GTG 75 Cervical Cerclage
- GTG 74 Antenatal Corticosteroids
- GTG 73 PPROM Summary Click Here
- NICE 25 Preterm Labour Summary Click Here
- All GTGs Links
https://www.rubabk4courses.com/courses/ |
Background
- Cerclage — a standard option for prophylactic intervention for those at risk of preterm birth & 2nd tri fetal loss
- Procedure to insert a stitch into cervix
- Aim is to prevent recurrent pregnancy loss
- Cervical insufficiency refers to weak cervix & unable to remain closed during pregnancy
- Cerclage provides structural support but maintaining cervical length more important
Definitions
History-indicated cerclage
- Insertion due to risk factors in patient’s history
- Prophylactic measure in asymptomatic
- Usually @ 11-14 wks
Preterm birth PTB— Birth occurring <37+0 wks
USG-indicated cerclage
- Done if cervical shortening seen on scan
- Therapeutic measure in asymptomatic without exposed fetal membranes in vagina
- USG usually TVS b/w 14-24 wks (with empty bladder)
Emergency cerclage (AKA physical exam-indicated)
- Salvage measure
- Inserted when premature cervical dilation with exposed fetal membranes in vagina
- Discovered by ultrasound or speculum/physical exam
- Considered up to 27+6 wks
Transvaginal cerclage (McDonald)
- Transvaginal purse-string suture placed at cervical isthmus junction without bladder mobilisation
High transvaginal cerclage requiring bladder mobilisation (including Shirodkar)
- Transvaginal purse-string suture after bladder mobilisation
- Inserted above cardinal ligaments
Transabdominal cerclage
- Suture via laparoscopy or laparotomy
- Placed at cervico-isthmic junction
Occlusion cerclage
- Occlusion of external os by placing continuous non-absorbable suture
- Benefits by retaining mucous plug
History-indicated cerclage
When to offer?
- Singleton pregnancy + ≥ 3 previous PTB — significant reduction in preterm birth before 37, 34 & 28 wks No change in PMR neonatal morbidity
- Only effective if ≥3 PTB <37 wks — 50% reduction
- Not routinely offered if ≤3 PTB ± 2nd tri loss without additional risk factors
- No benefit in those with previous cervical surgery or uterine abnormalities
Ultrasound-indicated cerclage
When to offer?
- Not recommended if singleton pregnancy with no other risk factor for PTB having found short cervix incidentally
- No overall benefit of cerclage with <25mm cx length with no other risk factors
- Routine surveillance for low risk not recommended
Singleton pregnancy & h/o PTB or spontaneous 2nd tri loss
- Undergoing USG surveillance — should be offered cerclage of cervix <25 mm at <24 wks
- Compared to expectant — Reduces pre-viable birth & perinatal death Does not prevent birth <35+0 wks unless length <15mm
- Cerclage not recommended for funnelling of cervix in absence of cervical shortening
Routine sonographic surveillance
- Having h/o PTB or 2nd tri spontaneous loss and not undergone history-indicated cerclage may be offered serial sonographic surveillance
- 40 - 70% women with h/o PTB or 2nd tri loss maintain cervical length >25 mm before 24 wks
- Those who maintain — 90% give birth after 34 wks
- If surveillance done — it helps in reducing the number of cerclage (only 42%)
|
Group of woman |
Recommendations |
At high risk |
|
|
At intermediate risk |
|
|
Cervical Cerclage for other groups at increased risk of preterm birth
Multiple Pregnancy
- History - or - ultrasound indicated cerclage — recommended
- No difference in perinatal death, neonatal morbidity or PTB <34 wks, CS
- USG-indicated cerclage associated with increased risk of LBW & RDS
- No intervention (progesterone, pessary or cerclage) significantly reduces risk of preterm birth
Cervical surgery, trauma and uterine abnormalities
- Local t/m of cervix — associated with increased risk of preterm birth
- Risk of PTB <37 wks —
- Cold knife conization vs no t/m 14% vs 5%
- LLETz vs no t/m 11% vs 7%
- No increased risk with laser ablation
- CIN have increased background risk of PTB
- Risk higher if undergone more than one treatment & with increasing depth of excision
- Recommendation by UK Preterm Clinical Network
- With h/o LLETZ with >10mm excised or >1 LLETZ or cone biopsy should be referred to preterm birth prevention specialist AND single TVS cervical scan b/w 18-22 wks as minimum
- With known uterine variant —Refer to preterm prevention specialist by 12 wks and offer TVS cervical scanning every 2-4 wks b/w 16-24 wks
Raised BMI
- Cerclage effective in those with BMI >25 kg/m2 + having cervical length <25mm
Transabdominal Cerclage
When to consider?
- Usually inserted after an unsuccessful vaginal cerclage or extensive cervical surgery
- Rate of PTB <32 wks significantly lower in those with abdominal cerclage vs low vaginal cerclage 8% vs 33%
- NNT to prevent one PTB 3.9
- No difference in PTB b/w high & low vaginal cerclage
- Transabdominal cerclage can be preformed pre-conceptually or in early pregnancy — no difference in live birth rate among two
- Pre-conceptual preferable as lower risk of anaesthesia / has no effect on fertility
- Comparing abdominal with vaginal cerclage — no difference b/w time to conceive or rates of conception
Which approach?
- Laparoscopic & open abdominal have similar efficacy —no difference in rates of 2nd tri loss, birth after 34 wks, 3rd tri birth & live birth rates
- Similar fetal survival rates More complications in laparotomy (22% vs 2%)
- Laparoscopic approach considered if expertise available
Care for delayed miscarriage and fetal death
- Difficult decisions which should be aided by senior obstetrician
- Complete evacuation through stitch by suction curettage or dilatation and evacuation (up to 18 wks)
- Alternatively, suture may be cut
- If failed, hysterectomy or CS may be needed
- Offer appropriate counselling and signpost to relevant patient support groups
Emergency cerclage
When to offer?
- Individualised decision
- Balance b/w prolongation of pregnancy with reduced neonatal morbidity /mortality against possibility go prolonged severe neonatal morbidity
- Decision to be aided by senior obstetrician
- Cerclage may delay birth by approx. 34 days (18-50) compared to expectant/bed rest alone
- 2-fold reduction of birth <34 wks
- Advanced dilation of cervix (>4 cm) or membrane prolapse associated with high chance of cerclage failure
Contraindication to cerclage insertion
- Active preterm labour
- Clinical chorioamniotis
- Continued vaginal bleeding
- PPROM
- Fetal compromise
- Lethal fetal defect
- Fetal death
Information to given to women — Give verbal and written information
- Before ANY cerclage inform
- Small risk of intra-op bladder damage, cervical trauma, membrane rupture and bleeding
- May be associated with cervical laceration/ trauma if spontaneous labour occurs
- High vaginal cerclage usually needs anaesthetic for removal
- Undergoing non-emergency cerclage inform
- Cerclage not associated with increased risk of PPROM, chorioamniotis, IOL or CS, increased risk PTB or 2nd tri loss
- May be associated with risk of cervical laceration/trauma if spontaneous labour and increased risk of maternal pyrexia
Pre-operative management
Investigations
- Before history-indicated cerclage — First tri USG and screening for aneuploidy
- Before ultrasound-indicated cerclage — Anomaly scan
- Maternal WBC and CRP in emergency cerclage — CRP <4 mg/dl WBC <14000/microlit associated with prolongation of pregnancy
Role of amniocentesis
- Insufficient evidence to recommend before rescue or USG-indiciated cerclage
- May be done in sleeted cases to aid management
- Some risk associated with procedure — does not increase risk of PTB <28wks
Amnioredcution — not recommended
Latency period b/w presentation & insertion of rescue or USG-indicated cerclage — individualised
Genital tract screening —not to be done in routine if positive culture from genital swab → decide antibiotics on individual basis
Operative issues
Perioperative tocolytics —No recommended to be used in routine
Perioperative antibiotics — discretion of operating team
Anasthesia — discretion of operating team / case by case
- Both GA & Regional can be used
- GA associated with shorter recovery time but higher demand for opoid and non-opioid analgesia
Day-case procedure — can be preformed safely
Technique of cerclage — discretion of surgeon
- If used vaginal suture to be placed as high as possible
- No difference in PTB or perinatal outcome with McDonalds or Shirodkar
Suture — use non-absorbable (mersiline tape or polyester braided thread)
Cervical Occlusion — no benefit
Adjuvant management
Bed rest — not recommended routinely
Sexual intercourse — abstinence not recommended routinely
Role of post-cerclage serial sonographic surveillance
- Not recommended in routine
- May be helpful in individual cases to offer timely steroids or in-utero transfer
- If history-indicated cerclage — additional USG-indicated cerclage not recommended in routine as it is associated with increase in pregnancy loss and birth before 35 wks
- Emergency cerclage after elective or USG-indicated cerclage to be decided on individual basis
Fetal fibronectin testing after cervical cerclage — not recommended in routine has high NPV so may provide reassurance
Supplemental progesterone — not recommended routinely
Arabian pessary or cerclage instead of cerclage — either of these alone are less effective than cerclage
When to remove cerclage?
Transvaginal cerclage to be removed before labour — usually b/w 36+1 - 37+0 wks unless birth by pre-labour CS (removal can be delayed until CS)
Established pre-term labour —Remove cerclage
Anaesthesia needed to remove high vaginal cerclage
All with abdominal cerclage require birth by CS & leave the suture in place after birth
Cerclage and PPROM
PPROM 24-34 wks and without infection or PTL — delay removal of cerclage by 48 hrs (to facilitate in utero transfer)
Delayed suture removal until labour — associated with increased risk of maternal/fetal sepsis and is not recommended
Before 23 wks and after 34 wks — delayed suture removal unlikely to be beneficial.
Thanx for the post. Very well summarized. Under multiple pregnancy, I think it should read “Not recommended”
ReplyDelete